Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80071 (PNJ)

SG ENCLAVE PHASE-I, RESIDENT WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. DEEPSHIKHA SHARMA AND ANR

COCP/2659/2023 · 2025-09-12

Vikram Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2659-2023(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2659-2023(O&M) Date of decision: 12.09.2025 SG Enclave Phase-I, Resident Welfare Society (Registered) and others … Petitioners Versus Deepshikha Sharma and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advocate, and Ms. Isha Janjua, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Khosla, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate, and Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocate, for the respondent(s). *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated 17.04.2023, CWP-7680-2023 was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court with the following directions: “Without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Amritsar Development Authority, Amritsar (respondent No.5) and Regional Director, Department of Local Bodies, Amritsar (respondent No.6) to consider and decide the legal notices dated 07.02.2023 and 14.02.2023 (Annexure P- 10), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The decision so taken, be conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. It is made clear that in case, the clause(s) as having been highlighted by the petitioner in the legal notices (Annexure P-10) are found to be correct, consequential action be initiated against respondent No.7. RAJAN KUMAR 2025.09.12 18:09 I am approving this document COCP-2659-2023(O&M) 2 It goes without saying that respondent No.7 shall also be associated by the aforementioned respondent Nos.5 and 6 before taking a final decision on legal notices served by the petitioner.” 2. Concededly, in compliance of the aforesaid directions, legal notices dated 07.02.2023 & 14.02.2023 stand decided. Still further, it is also a conceded position that since the contents of the legal notices were found to be true to some extent, action has been initiated against respondent No.7. 3. As regards the transfer of non-saleable open spaces such as roads, parks etc., as mentioned in clause XXI of the licence, the Court has been informed that a total area of 25.32 acres has been transferred in the name of State Government, except an area measuring 0.05 acres (i.e. 242 sq. yards), for which respondent No.7 has agreed to mortgage a plot measuring 291 sq. yards. 4. As regards the NOC from Punjab Pollution Control Board, learned Senior counsel states that the same has been granted up to 28.06.2030. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. That being so, the directions issued vide order dated 17.04.2023 stand complied with. Under the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court in the present contempt petition. 6. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved on account of any inaction at a later stage, they shall be at liberty to avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law. 7. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 8. Rule is discharged. 9. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Vikram Aggarwal ) Judge September 12, 2025 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAJAN KUMAR 2025.09.12 18:09 I am approving this document