Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80059 (PNJ)

PARMOD KUMAR GOEL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS\

CWP/19983/2025 · 2025-07-31

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AT CHANDIGARH. 289 CWP-19983-2025. Date of Decision: 31.07.2025. Parmod Kumar Goel ....Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Salooja, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had sought transfer of plot on the basis of General Power of Attorney (GPA) executed by his son, who is owner of the plot and is residing abroad. The petitioner is 82 years old and his application was accompanied by the fees of Rs.13,000/-. However, the application has been erroneously rejected on frivolous ground 'for want of verification of GPA'. He further submits that once he had filed the application along with all the necessary documents, it was enjoined upon respondent No.2 to properly verify the documents before arbitrarily rejecting his application. He also submits that the application had been duly approved at four stages but the Estate Officer for the reasons best known to him has arbitrarily rejected the application. JITENDER 2025.07.31 17:05 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-19983-2025 -2- 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that e-mail has been received from Estate Officer, HSVP, Sonipat, to the effect that the application of the petitioner is being processed and he would be refunded the administrative fee deposited earlier and the Office of Estate Officer, HSVP, was directed to recommend the application without getting the GPA verified from the registering authority. He has furnished a copy of the e-mail, which is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be substantially redressed. The petition stands disposed of accordingly at this stage. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 31.07.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.07.31 17:05 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC