VISHAL @ VINAY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/16417/2025 · 2025-08-31
Santosh Rai, Siddharth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16417 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
1. Short counter affidavit filed today in Court on behalf of respondent no.4 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. Archana Jha, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned AGA for the State-respondents.
3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 14.6.2025, registered as Case Crime No.289 of 2025, under Sections- 115(2), 352, 333, 69, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Tanda, District- Rampur and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
5. Learned counsel for respondent no.4 submits that the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and the respondent no.4 has no objection in case the impugned FIR is quashed.
6. Accordingly, the impugned FIR is quashed.
7. The writ petition is allowed.
8. Investigating officer of this case is directed to make entry of this compromise in the case diary.
9. Let this order be communicated to the S.P., Rampur, by the Registrar (Compliance) within 10 days. September 1, 2025 RA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pragati, Shaili Ganguly Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archana Jha, G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Vishal @ Vinay And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad