- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31430 CRL.P No. 8940 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8940 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAY HASMUKH DAVE S/O HASMUKH DAVE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS TECHNO SAT COMM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DIRECTOR OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, 3, MARNEK CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, 399 A, DR. D.B. MARG GRANT ROAD MUMBAI - 400 004. 2. SRI. SHYAM ASWANI S/O MANIK SHYAM ASWANI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, TECHNO SAT COMM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 3, MARNEK CHAMBERS 1ST FLOOR, 399 A, DR. D.B. MARG GRANT ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 004. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI ACHAPPA P B, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. ADVANCE CABLE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED., REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-1 SUNRISE SERENIT, 40 FEET ROAD Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31430 CRL.P No. 8940 of 2023 M.R GARDEN, GEDDALAHALLI ASHWATHNAGAR BANGALORE -560 094. REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. RAVINDRA. 2. M/s. TECHNO SAT COMM INDIA PVT LIMITED MANEK CHAMBERS, B-399A LAMINGTON ROAD MUMBAI - 400 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. NIRAV DEV 3. SRI. NIRAV KUMAR H DAVE MANAGING DIRECTOR TECHNO SAT COMM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 3, MARNEK CHAMBERS,1ST FLOOR, 399A DR. D.B. MARG GRANT ROAD MUMBAI - 400 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI AJAY J N AND AJAY J NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE ACCUSED NO.2 / PETITIONER NO.1 AND ACCUSED NO.4 / PETITIONER NO.2 HEREIN PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C AND ANNEXURE-G RESPECTIVELY AND DELETE THE NAMES OF THE ACCUSED NO.2 AND 4 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES IN C.C.NO.20911/2022 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31430 CRL.P No. 8940 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that the matter is settled. 2. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having settled. 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4