Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8002 (UTT)

TARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/848/2023 · 2025-09-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 16.09.2025 WPSS No. 848 of 2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the Bar that due to subsequent developments, present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.09.2025 Mahinder/