IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.859 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1. Aakash Kumar S/o Dilip Painter @ Deelip Penter @ Dilip Singh R/o Ji Chaudhari Gali, P.S. - Town, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 2. Mohit Kumar S/o Suraj Mahto R/o Ji Chaudhari Gali, P.S. - Town, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 3. Raju Kumar S/o Shiv Prasad R/o Ji Chaudhari Gali, P.S. - Town, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 4. Sunil Kumar S/o Shiv Prasad R/o Ji Chaudhari Gali, P.S. - Town, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 5. Vikash Kumar S/o Dilip Painter @ Deelip Penter @ Dilip Singh R/o Ji Chaudhari Gali, P.S. - Town, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ujjawal Bhushan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352(3)(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 03.10.2024 at about 10 AM, when the informant went to his shop, these petitioners alongwith co-accused Pramod Kumar came there and thereafter, co-accused Pramod Kumar assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod, due to which, he fell down. It is further alleged that petitioner nos. 1 & 3 took away 2-3 cartoons of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.859 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 articles from the informant’s shop worth Rs. 1.5 lakh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties are shopkeepers and due to business rivalry, this false and concocted case has been lodged. As per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Pramod Kumar. Rest of the allegations are ornamental. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 610 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T