Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134127 Court No. - 71 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26352 of 2025 Applicant :- Bhashkar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Swati Agrawal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J.
1. Mrs. Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit today in the Court, which is taken on record. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant- accused Bhashkar Singh for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 109(1) of B.N.S. in Case Crime No. 241 of 2025, Police Station- Sikriganj, District Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel appears for the applicant and submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. The role assigned to the applicant is only of exhortation. There is cross version of the FIR as the parties indulge into cross fight. The accused-applicant has been arrested on the same day, therefore, the applicants were not medically examined. There is fracture of 5th metacorpol bone of left hand of Kaushelndra. The injury of Prabhu Nath is simple in nature. The injury of Ram Sajeele Singh is fracture of left temporal bone. No abnormality deducted in the medico-legal report of Gorakh Singh. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and submits that the charge sheet has been submitted and applicant has no criminal history. 5. This court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. The perusal of the record prima facie reveals that the accused has been assigned the role of exhortation, wherein 10 named and 8-10 unnamed persons have been implicated in the FIR. There is cross version of the FIR filed by the Vivekanand Singh one of the
accused in this FIR. The cross fight between the parties was on the point of drain. The parties are neighbours. The accused is languishing in jail since 09.06.2025. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Mini (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad