- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38467 WP No. 28149 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.28149 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O. MUNIYAPPA @ D. ABBAYYAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS RESIDING AT MELINAPETE HOSAKOTE TOWN-562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O. SHARADAMBHA, ESHWAR RAO HOUSE 6TH CROSS, T. G. EXTENSION HOSAKOTE TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114 …PETITIONER (BY SRI A. G. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT REPTD. BY IT SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110 Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38467 WP No. 28149 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203 4. THE TAHSILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK HOSAKOTE TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA, A.G.A.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT/EVICTION NOTICE DATED 08.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT- TAHSILDAR AT HOSAKOTE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-N VIDE NO. N.C.R.161/2023-2024 DATED 08.09.2025 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4/TAHASILDAR OF HOSAKOTE TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION DATED 23.12.1998 FILED FOR REGULARIZATION OF UN AUTHORISED POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned endorsement at Annexure-N issued by the respondent- Tahsildar, Hosakote Taluk, stating that since the petitioner has not filed any Application in Form No.53 during the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38467 WP No. 28149 of 2025 year 1998, the claim of the petitioner for regularization of unauthorized occupation cannot be considered. 2. This Court therefore directed the learned Additional Government Advocate on 17.09.2025, to secure and placed before this Court the original Application Register of the year 1998. Accordingly, the learned Additional Government Advocate has today produced the original Application Register. 3. This Court has gone through the original Register and does not find the name of the petitioner in the Register. In that view of the matter, no fault can be found in the impugned endorsement issued by the Tahsildar. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT:VC