Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79993 (ALL)

RAMPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10763/2025 · 2025-08-12

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:137706 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10763 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rampal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Roopesh Kumar Nigam,Sanket Kumar,Udantika Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities, Govt. Polytechnic, Farrukhabad, Fatehgarh, District-Farrukhabad to regularize the petitioner on the post of Sweeper as per the Govt. order dated 13.08.2015. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent nos. 2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 25.05.2024 filed by the petitioner within stipulated period so fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Director, Technical Education Directorate, U.P., Kanpur is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad