APHC010083952020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 4970/2020 Between: KAGITA DURGA BHAVANI, W/O. KAGITA NAGA SUDHAKAR, RIO. D.NO.16/356-4, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME' DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. A VARA PRASAD, S/O. NAGENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.32-35-3/1, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and No.4 in not acting upon the complaint 14.02.2020 given by the petitioner and also for threatening and pressurizing the petitioner to compromise with 5th respondent and to withdraw the complaint as being illegal arbitrary and 2 is in negation of the law declared by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari vs. State Of U.P and others.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.77 of 2020 on the file of Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District for the offences under Sections 506 and 509 IPC has been registered. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4970 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh