- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54215 WP No. 22173 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 22173 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI BHARATH PATIL M G AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS S/O LATE S G DODDAPPA GOWDA R/AT NO. 138, MARALU SIDDESHWARA NILAYA MAIN ROAD, BEHIND PEACE COTTAGE THARALABALU EXTENSION SHIVAMOGGA- 577204 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVYASHREE.G.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001 2. THE TAHSILDAR SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA 577201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION QUASHING Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54215 WP No. 22173 of 2022 THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 21.09.22 IN RD NO 0039017835220, AND 10.10.22 IN NO. ITHARE DRU.C.R. 126/2022-23 AND DATED 10.10.22 NO. ITHARE DRU.C.R. 127/2022-23 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR A COPY OF WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-M, M1 AND M2 TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the Endorsements dated 21.09.2022 and 10.10.2022, at Annexure- M, M1, M2, respectively issued by respondent No.2 herein, inter alia sought for direction on respondent No.2 to consider the representation at Annexure- K and L, respectively. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner has to establish that the petitioner is adopted son of Sri S.G Doddappagowda and Smt Sumithra M.G before a competent Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54215 WP No. 22173 of 2022 4. In that view of the matter, I am view that no interference is called for in this writ petition as the disputed question of facts are involved in this petition. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE RJ: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37