Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79970 (KAR)

CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30083/2025 · 2025-11-05

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44935 WP No. 30083 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 30083 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.924 KONAPPANA AGARAHARA KRISHNA REDDY LAYOUT ELECTRONIC CITY POST BANGALORE 560 100. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE THASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL 572 101 3. THE TALUK SURVEYOR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL 572 101 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44935 WP No. 30083 of 2025 4. MUNISWAMY REDDY S/O KEMPARANAGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT INDALAVADI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL 572 101 5. SUNITHA MAHADEVA W/O MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT INDALAVADI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL 572 101 6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANEKAL POLICE STATION REP BY SPPL HIGH COURT BUILDING HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 AND R6; NOTICE TO R4 AND R5 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO 6 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION / COMPLAINT AT ANNEXURE – G WITH RESPECT TO LAND IN SY.NO.167/3 TO AN EXTENT OF 2 GUNTAS SITUATED AT INDALVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44935 WP No. 30083 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 3 and 6. 2. Notice to respondents No.4 and 5 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: “a) Direct the Respondent No.6 to consider representation/complaint at Annexure-G with respect to land in Sy No:167/3 to an extent of 2 guntas situated at Indalvadi Village, Kasaba Hobli, Anekal Taluk in the interest of justice and equity. b) And Such other and further directions, order or relief that this Court may be pleased to grant in the interest of justice and equity.” 4. By way of the representation at Annexure – G, the petitioner has sought for police protection to be offered to the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the trial Court in O.S No.256/2025. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44935 WP No. 30083 of 2025 5. On enquiry, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application seeking for police protection is also filed before the trial Court. If that is so, it is for the trial Court to consider the same and pass necessary orders. 6. This Court cannot direct police protection to be offered to implement an exparte ad-interim order of injunction passed. 7. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7