KORUPOLU SRI RAMA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/4547/2025 · 2025-02-25
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010083762025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4547/2025 Between:
1. KORUPOLU SRI RAMA MURTHY, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA VURU, ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
2. KORUPOLU POTHI NAIDU, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O GANDIVARI KOMPALU, DOPPERLA, ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
3. KORUPOLU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA,
ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
4. RAJANA SATYAVATHI, D/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O UDDAPALEM, PUDIMADAKA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
5. BANDARU KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, D/O K.APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA,ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
6. K. VENKATA RAO, S/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
7. BOBBIN VARAHALAMMA, D/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
...PETITIONER(S)
2
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR R AND BR, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP
5. THE TAHSILDAR, ATCHUTAPURAM MANDAL ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT
6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, ATCHUTAPURAM, MANDAL, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT A
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri B. Parameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
2. Request granted.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs.
3
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 25.02.2025 Vns