Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7997 (AP)

KORUPOLU SRI RAMA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4547/2025 · 2025-02-25

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010083762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4547/2025 Between: 1. KORUPOLU SRI RAMA MURTHY, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA VURU, ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 2. KORUPOLU POTHI NAIDU, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O GANDIVARI KOMPALU, DOPPERLA, ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 3. KORUPOLU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA, ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 4. RAJANA SATYAVATHI, D/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O UDDAPALEM, PUDIMADAKA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 5. BANDARU KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, D/O K.APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA,ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 6. K. VENKATA RAO, S/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 7. BOBBIN VARAHALAMMA, D/O K APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O DOPPERLA ATCHUTAPURAM, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR R AND BR, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT AP 5. THE TAHSILDAR, ATCHUTAPURAM MANDAL ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT 6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, ATCHUTAPURAM, MANDAL, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT A ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri B. Parameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs. 3 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 25.02.2025 Vns