Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132853 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10635 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mousam Agnihotri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jigar Khare,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(A)- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned promotion order of Respondent No. 4 dated 19.04.2025 as well as Seniority List of Class IV employees of Session 2025-26 (Annexure No.1 and 1A to this writ petition) passed by the respondent authority. (B)- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun i.e. Respondent No.2 to not release the salary in favour of the respondent no. 4 to the post of Class III employee of the Institution during the pendency of the Writ Petition. (C) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Respondents-Authorities to pass a fresh order after considering the representations of the petitioner dated 10.08.2024, 04.07.2025 and 07.07.2025 in accordance with law and further respondent authority may also be directed that if petitioner found eligible then issue appointment letter in favour of the petitioner to the Class III employee in the institution concerned and release all consequential benefits as admissible under the law for the post of Class III employee." 2. After some length of argument, Sri R. K. Ojha, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the petition on merits and made innocuous prayer to represent his case before respondent no.2 by way of filing a detailed representation and also prayed that respondent no.2 may be directed to pass appropriate and reasoned order on the same expeditiously, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, Sri Saurabh, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the instant petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri R. K. Ojha, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5.Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made by learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and no objection from other side, without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner. 6. Petitioner is directed to represent his case by way of detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 the District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun at Orai within 10 days. Thereafter, the respondent no.2 is directed to pass appropriate and reasoned order on the same in accordance with law after hearing all the effected parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks, without influencing from the promotional order passed in favour of respondent no.4. 7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad