Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79890 (PNJ)

MANPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7743/2025 · 2025-07-21

Sumeet Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119) CRWP-7743-2025 Decided on :21.07.2025 MANPREET SINGH ……Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through V.C.). **** SUMEET GOEL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. The petition in hand has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following substantive prayer(s):- “It is, therefore, most humbly respectfully prayed that in view of the submissions made above the life and liberty of the present petitioner may kindly be protected and necessary legal action be taken against accused person.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime has limited his prayer by stating that he would be satisfied, for the nonce, if a direction is issued to Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to consider and take a conscious decision on the representation dated 13.07.2025 made by the petitioner (copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure P-1 with the petition in hand) in a time-bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the strength of advance copy, Mr. Gurpartap S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. He has urged that he NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.21 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRWP-7743-2025 P a g e | 2 has no objection in case limited prayer made by the petitioner, for decision of his representation dated 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-1), is directed for. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the rival party(s) and upon perusal of the paper-book, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the petition in hand with the following directions: (i) Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is mandated to look into the representation dated 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) moved by the petitioner, objectively consider the grievance(s) raised therein & take ratiocinated decision thereupon within a period of 15 days from today. Said decision be conveyed to the petitioner within 7 days thereafter. (ii) No order as to costs. (SUMEET GOEL) July 21, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.21 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh