Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7988 (KER)

SANTHAKUMARI., v. STATE OF KERALA,

WP(C)/35156/2022 · 2025-04-08

Viju Abraham

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) No.35156 of 2022 1 2025:KER:30494 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 35156 OF 2022 PETITIONER: SANTHAKUMARI.,AGED 56 YEARS W/O SREEKRISHNAN, PATHIKKATTUCHALLA, PATTANCHERY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678532. REP.BY HER HUSBAND, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SREEKRISHNAN AGED 64 YEARS, PATHIKKATTUCHALLA, PATTANCHERY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678532. BY ADV R.HARISHANKAR RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682031. 2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, PALAKKAD- 678 001. 3 THE DISTRICT POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, PALAKKAD- 678 001. 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MEENAKSHIPURAM POLICE STATION MEENAKSHIPURAM, PALAKKAD - 678533. 5 KANNAN @ HARIDAS, S/O LATE KRISHNAMANI, MALLAMKOLUMBU, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD- 678507. 6 RAJAN, S/O LATE KRISHNAMANI, MALLAMKOLUMBU, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD 678 507. 7 KALADHARAN, S/O LATE KRISHNAMANI, MALLAMKOLUMBU, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD- 678507. W.P.(C) No.35156 of 2022 2 2025:KER:30494 8 AMBIKA, D/O LATE KRISHNAMANI, MALLAMKOLUMBU, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD- 678507. 9 SUJATHA, D/O LATE KRISHNAMANI, MALLAMKOLUMBU, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD- 678507. BY ADVS. RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY VIJINA K. ARUL MURALIDHARAN OTHER PRESENT: GP- RIYAL DEVASSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.35156 of 2022 3 2025:KER:30494 VIJU ABRAHAM, J. ................................................................. W.P.(C) No.35156 of 2022 ................................................................. Dated this the 8th day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT When the matter came up for consideration on 05.03.2025 this Court has directed the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice on respondents 8 and 9 in their correct address, but no steps have been taken by the petitioner. Therefore the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE cks W.P.(C) No.35156 of 2022 4 2025:KER:30494 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35156/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2013 IN O.S.NO.244/2011 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHITTUR. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.09.2021 IN AS NO.104/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-IV, PALAKKAD. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2022 IN EP NO.2/2022 IN O.S.NO.244/2011 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHITTUR. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 21.09.2022 FILED BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 01.10.2022 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 06.10.2022 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 15.10.2022 FILED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND HUSBAND OF PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 15.10.2022 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT.