Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7987 (RAJ)

VIKASH MEENA S/O RAMSWAROOP MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2585/2025 · 2025-07-04

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24741] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR (1) S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2585/2025 Vikash Meena S/o Ramswaroop Meena, R/o Naya Ganv, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi, Presently Residing At House No. B- 174, D Block, Murtikala Colony, Jaipur. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement Since 03.02.2025 At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With (2) S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2768/2025 Murari Meena S/o Asharam Meena, R/o Village Mandaliya, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk, At Present House No. B-174, D Block, Murtikala Colony, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Tarun Jain, Adv. Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. with Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. For Respondent : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 04/07/2025 1. As these bail applications have been filed pertaining to the same FIR, they are being heard and decided by the instant common order. [2025:RJ-JP:24741] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-2585/2025] 2. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- applicants under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 in the matter arising out of FIR No.55/2025, registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2)(a), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), and 336(3) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 by which the bail application of the accused-applicants under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that charge-sheet against the accused-applicants has been filed for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicant-Vikash Meena was arrested on 03.02.2025 and the accused-applicant-Murari Meena was arrested on 28.01.2025 and since then, they are behind the bars. Learned counsel also submits that age of the accused-applicant-Vikash Meena is about 19 years and the accused-applicant-Murari Meena is about 18 years. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants contends that the charges levelled against the accused-applicants are triable by Judicial Magistrate and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel further contends that there is no private complainant in this matter and only meager amount is said to be earned by the accused-applicants by committing cyber fraud. [2025:RJ-JP:24741] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-2585/2025] Learned counsel prays that no other criminal case has been registered against the accused-applicants, therefore, the accused- applicants be granted benefit of bail. 5. Learned Deputy Government Advocate along with learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently oppose these bail applications and submit that the matter pertains to commission of cyber fraud by the accused-applicants, therefore, the accused- applicants should not be enlarged on bail. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the accused-applicants; no other criminal case has been registered against the accused-applicants and also that the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow these bail applications filed by the applicants. 8. Consequently, these bail applications filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 are allowed. It is ordered that accused- applicants namely (1) Vikash Meena S/o Ramswaroop Meena & (2) Murari Meena S/o Asharam Meena, arrested in connection with FIR No.55/2025, registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicants shall be required to [2025:RJ-JP:24741] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-2585/2025] appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 9. The accused-applicants are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-applicants to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, learned counsel for the State shall be free to move the application against the accused-applicants for cancellation of bail before the concerned Magistrate. 10. Copy of this order also be sent to the concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /356-357-S.