Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 34164 of 2025 Dr. Rajesh Kumar Rout ..... Petitioner Mr. S.D. Routray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 12.12.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to: i) Admit the writ application. ii) Call for the record. iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/writs direction/directions directing the opposite parties more particularly opposite party no.1 to regularize the service of the petitioner from the date of initial appointment and extend all consequential service and financial benefits as due and admissible in terms of the order dated 16.04.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Diary No.22600/2022 and batch (State of Odisha Versus Dr. Rajendra Kumar Dash and others) under Annexure: 8, Page 2 of 2. the order dated 22.04.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P. (C) No. 5958/2018 under Annexure: 10 and the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Opposite Party No.1 under Annexure: 9 within a reasonable time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. iv) And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti