- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5145 WP No. 21889 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 21889 OF 2015 BETWEEN: 1. P. DEVENDRA GOWDA S/O LATE P. VEERANNA GOWDA, AGED: 52 YEARS, 2. P. SOMASHEKARA GOWDA S/O LATE P. VEERANNA GOWDA, AGED 43 YEARS, 3. P. CHANNABASAVANA GOWDA S/O LATE P. VEERANNA GOWDA, AGED 40 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF OLD HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-583 212. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PORT AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI SUB DIVISION, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5145 WP No. 21889 of 2015 HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-583 212. 3. GRAMA PANCHAYATH, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-583 212, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.03.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on 20.03.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5145 WP No. 21889 of 2015 The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 51