[2025:RJ-JP:9214] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2903/2025 Babulal Balai S/o Shri Bhorilal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Kathawala, Post Yarlipura, Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, De- partment Of School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secre- tariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner 4. Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur 5. District Education Officer (H.q.), Secondary Education, Jaipur 6. District Education Officer (H.q.), Elementary Education, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner could not refute that the petitioners would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Ser- vices (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short “Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as de- fined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available [2025:RJ-JP:9214] (2 of 2) [CW-2903/2025] in law, the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for with- drawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the Ra- jasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for re- dressal of his grievance. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands dis- posed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the RAT for re- dressal of his grievance. If the petitioner files appropriate petition before the RAT within a period of 30 days, the RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months. Needless to say, no prejudice to be caused to the petitioner based on any observations made hereinabove. Registry (RAT) is directed to act as per the directions spelled out in SBCWP No. 2335/2025 titled as Mohammad Kasif vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /164