IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.2930 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd April, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Vikram ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Hitesh, Advocate vice Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that in view of subsequent events, as the petitioner has been enlarged on parole, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, petition is disposed of being infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge April 02, 2024 (Chiranjeev)