IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 124 KAMAL SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik dated 11.03.2019 under Sections 323, 324, 34, 506 of IPC (and Sections 307, 201, 212 IPC and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of Arms Act added later on) registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palw along with all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2025 (Annexure P 2. to accept the prayer of the petitioner too, on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition. 3. stab wounds with a knife on the abdomen of respondents No.3, 4 and 5, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: KAMAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.0205 dated 11.03.2019 under Sections 323, 324, 34, 506 of IPC (and Sections 307, 201, 212 IPC and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of Arms Act added later on) registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palw along with all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2025 (Annexure P-2). After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioner to quash the FIR in question, an too, on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition. It needs to be noticed that the petitioners have been stab wounds with a knife on the abdomen of respondents No.3, 4 and 5, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-37660-2025 Date of decision: July 18, 2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of seeking quashing of FIR No.0205 dated 11.03.2019 under Sections 323, 324, 34, 506 of IPC (and Sections 307, 201, 212 IPC and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of Arms Act added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palwal (Annexure P-1) along with all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to quash the FIR in question, and that too, on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for It needs to be noticed that the petitioners have been attributed stab wounds with a knife on the abdomen of respondents No.3, 4 and 5, ...Petitioners ...Respondents The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of seeking quashing of FIR No.0205 dated 11.03.2019 under Sections 323, 324, 34, 506 of IPC (and Sections 307, , 1) along with all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined d that too, on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for attributed stab wounds with a knife on the abdomen of respondents No.3, 4 and 5, Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.18 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-37660 which injuries were opined to be dangerous to life. It is discernable from a perusal of the FIR that it was a premeditated attack carried ou accused, who were armed with lethal weapons including knives and firearm. 4. petitioners as well as the seat of injuries, this Court does not deem it fit to accept the prayer compromise as it is totally contrary to the settled law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narayan, AIR 2019 SC 1296 5. instant petition. 6. 7. July 18, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 37660-2025 which injuries were opined to be dangerous to life. It is discernable from a of the FIR that it was a premeditated attack carried ou accused, who were armed with lethal weapons including knives and firearm. Keeping in view the nature of injuries allegedly attributed to the petitioners as well as the seat of injuries, this Court does not deem it fit to accept the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of a compromise as it is totally contrary to the settled law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh Narayan, AIR 2019 SC 1296. At this stage, a prayer has been ma instant petition. Ordered accordingly. Dismissed as withdrawn. July 18, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- which injuries were opined to be dangerous to life. It is discernable from a of the FIR that it was a premeditated attack carried out by all the accused, who were armed with lethal weapons including knives and firearm. Keeping in view the nature of injuries allegedly attributed to the petitioners as well as the seat of injuries, this Court does not deem it fit to for quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of a compromise as it is totally contrary to the settled law laid down by the The State of Madhya Pradesh V/s Laxmi At this stage, a prayer has been made for withdrawal of the (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No which injuries were opined to be dangerous to life. It is discernable from a t by all the Keeping in view the nature of injuries allegedly attributed to the petitioners as well as the seat of injuries, this Court does not deem it fit to for quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of a compromise as it is totally contrary to the settled law laid down by the V/s Laxmi de for withdrawal of the Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.18 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh