Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7984 (PNJ)

VINOD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/60572/2025 · 2026-07-14

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-60572-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 312 CRM-M-60572-2025 Date of decision: 14th July, 2026 Vinod ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Vishal Khatkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Yash Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No. 488 dated 23.08.2019 registered under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 506 of IPC at Police Station City Jind and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise deed dated 06.06.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 18.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-60572-2025 -2- learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 09.12.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 488 dated 23.08.2019 registered under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 506 of IPC at Police Station City Jind and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 06.06.2025(Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 14th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document