Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10273 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
SIVASUBRAMANIAN S.
S/O G.SWAMINATHAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO.17, KUMARAKRUPA 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS MATHRU LAYOUT BEHIND MOTHER DAIRY GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BENGALURU-560 065. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN POLICE STATION CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA CIRCLE HASSAN DISTRICT-573 116.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
SMT. ROOPA D.R.
W/O GOIPINATHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT GOUNDEGOWDEN KOPPALU HASSAN TOWN, VIVEKANAGARA AND CLOSE TO VIDYA NAGAR 2ND STAGE, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. YASHWANTH NETHAJI N.T., ADVOCAET FOR SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.195/2020 REGISTERED BY THE CHANNARAYAPATANA TOWN POLICE STATION, CHANNARAYAPATANA, HASSAN DISTRICT AND REGISTER AS C.C.NO.459/2022, UNDER SECTION 306 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND PENDING IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNARAYAPATNA, HASSAN DISTRICT IN DOCUMENT NO.2.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER Husband of respondent no.2 unfortunately committed suicide on 08.10.2020. He has written a death note. The same reveals that he had financial transactions with several persons wherein he had lent loans and he had borrowed loans. The persons to whom he had lent the loan were not repaying the same to him and the persons from whom he had borrowed the loan were putting pressure on him to repay the same. Unable to bear the pressure he committed suicide. One such person who had to pay money to the deceased, as per the death note, is the petitioner herein and the deceased has mentioned that the petitioner has cheated him. On the said ground petitioner has been accused of committing an offence under Section 306 of IPC and it has culminated in C.C.No.459/2022 pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC Court, Channarayapatna, Hassan District.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he has not cheated the deceased and in fact he has repaid all the amounts due. It is further submitted that the deceased was under the wrong
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
impression that petitioner had cheated him. It is also submitted that the deceased was under a delusion and he has written the name of the petitioner erroneously in the death note. It is submitted that the deceased was addicted to gambling because of which he incurred huge losses and committed suicide.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that it is because petitioner cheated the deceased, he has committed suicide. Be that as it may, even presuming the contents of death note to be true, the question that arises for
consideration in the instant case is whether it is sufficient to hold the petitioner guilty of the offence under Section 306 of IPC.
4. Section 306 of IPC reads as under:
"306. Abetment of suicide.—If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine."
5. In order to convict a person under Section 306 of IPC there has to be a clear mens rea on the part of the accused
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
to commit the offence. It requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide, leaving him no option, and such act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he committed suicide. In the instant case, as per the death note, even if presumed to be true, reveals that the petitioner had taken money from the deceased and had not repaid it. It also reveals that the deceased had lent money to others and had borrowed money from several other persons and unable to bear the overall pressure of the financial losses he has committed suicide. Under the circumstances, in my opinion, one cannot infer mens rea on part of the petitioner which satisfies the requirement of Section 306 IPC. Thus, even if the death note is presumed to be true, the petitioner will have to be acquitted and continuing the trial against the petitioner will only be an act of futility.
6. Hence, the following:
ORDER i. The petition is allowed;
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49537 CRL.P No. 10273 of 2022
ii. The proceedings in C.C.No.459/2022 pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC Court, Channarayapatna, Hassan District insofar as it relates to the petitioner herein is concerned stand quashed; iii. It is needless to state that if respondent no.2 or any of the legal heirs of deceased are of the opinion that the petitioner is liable to pay them the amounts, they are always at liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with law to recover the same.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20