W.P.No.28462 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.No.28462 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.31876 of 2025 G.Subramani .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector of Thiruvannamalai Collector Office Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. 4. The Block Development Officer Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. 5. The Tahsildar Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. .. Respondents ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28462 of 2025 Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner and other village residents' representation dated 23.06.2025 and to construct the Panchayat Board Office at some other location and to protect the playground of the Sangeethavadi Panchayat Board High School immediately. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Suseela Devi For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthik Jegannath Government Advocate ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard. Having perused the material on record and the affidavit now filed by petitioner, at this stage, any interference by this Court is not called for. 2. The pictorial representation, as reflected from the photographs, which have been filed by both the parties, show that in place of old building, new building has come up. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28462 of 2025 3. The statement of learned counsel for the petitioner that some more area is included, is without any material. It is only on the basis of visual impression that such kind of statement is being made. Huge area is still lying vacant for playground in school. 4. We find that the petition has been filed on exaggerated statement and does not warrant any indulgence by writ Court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application is also dismissed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 13.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28462 of 2025 To 1. The District Collector of Thiruvannamalai Collector Office Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. 4. The Block Development Officer Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. 5. The Tahsildar Arni Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28462 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (kpl) W.P.No.28462 of 2025 13.08.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis