Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through Virtual Mode) RP No. 49/2023 c/w RFA No. 18/2021 Khurshid Ahmad Magrey …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs Mohammad Aman Bhat .…. Respondent(s) Through: None
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 29.09.2025 RP No. 49/2023
1. The record reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on
30.08.2025.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today also, even when the matter is called twice. An inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
RFA No. 18/2021
4. The record reveals that that none has appeared on behalf of the appellant on 30.08.2025 Sr. No. 1
2 RP No. 49/2023 c/w RFA No. 18/2021
5. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant today also, even when the matter is called twice. An inference can be drawn that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the instant appeal. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
6. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 29.09.2025 Raj Kumar