HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27533 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. Heard Sri Sadaqat Ullah Khan, learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ajeet, with a prayer to release him on bail in S.T. No. 1908 of 2024,( State Vs. Ajeet), Case Crime No. 74 of 2024, under Sections 376(3), 323 of IPC, and section 3/4 (2) of POCSO Act, Police Station- Airport, District- Prayagraj, during pendency of trial. This is the second bail application. The first bail application of applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that before the trial court nearly all the witnesses of fact have been examined. The victim is absconding with some other boy and is not appearing before the court despite issuance of bailable warrant of Rs. 20,000/- against her since 06.05.2025. He has further submitted that another F.I.R. has been lodged by the father of the victim on 09.05.2025 under section 137(2) of B.N.S.S., against unknown accused regarding abduction of her daughter(the victim). The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 29.06.2024. The trial in the aforesaid case is not likely to be concluded in near future. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre- trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sadaqat Ullah Khan, Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Singh Yadav, G.A. Ajeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) applicant is released on bail, he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, keeping in view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the paragraph no.53 of Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate of Enforcement 2024, (SC)LawSuit 677 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, BAIL No. 27533 of 2025 2 then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 15, 2025 Abhishek BAIL No. 27533 of 2025 3 (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad