Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79782 (KAR)

THE COMMISSIONER v. M/S ABHISHEK PROPBUILD PRIVATE LIMITED

MFA/1324/2024 · 2025-09-08

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35867 MFA No. 1324 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1324 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 027 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, DR. T.M.C. ROYAN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023. 3. THE JOINT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, DR. T.M.C. ROYAN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023. 4. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER - BBMP BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 027 5. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER - BBMP (WEST) BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 027. Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35867 MFA No. 1324 of 2024 6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSINER - BBMP (WEST) BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 027. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BATHE GOWDA K.V., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S ABHISHEK PROPBUILD PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ABHISHEK DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED) NO.41, VITTAL MALYA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. RAVI SHANKAR …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.12.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.8501/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE/VACATION CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35867 MFA No. 1324 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT It is submitted that the suit itself has been disposed of and nothing survives in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructous. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT-SG