CWP-20241-202 121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Lakhwinder Singh and Others The State of Punjab and Another CORAM : HON'BLE Present: Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the judgment in CWP No. 22422 of 2010, titled as Kumar and others Vs. State of Punjab and others benefit is not being giv justification. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated but the same is still pendi will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent in case, the legal notice dated 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CWP Date of Decision : Lakhwinder Singh and Others VERSUS The State of Punjab and Another CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. -.- HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the judgment in CWP No. 22422 of 2010, titled as Kumar and others Vs. State of Punjab and others benefit is not being given to the petitioners and that too without any valid Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent in case, the legal notice dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20241-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.07.2025 ....Petitioners ....Respondents HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the judgment in CWP No. 22422 of 2010, titled as “Anil Kumar and others Vs. State of Punjab and others”, decided on 16.05.2012 but the en to the petitioners and that too without any valid Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P ng consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that (Annexure P-8) has been received in the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are Anil , decided on 16.05.2012 but the en to the petitioners and that too without any valid Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have (Annexure P-8) ng consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the , who State and submits that 8) has been received in the TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.22 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20241-202 office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. July 21, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) ncerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by propriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners eaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present petitions may kindly be f having been not pressed any further. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- ncerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by propriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners eaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the , the present petitions may kindly be Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No ncerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by propriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners eaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the , the present petitions may kindly be TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.22 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document