SRI K SHIVASHANKAR v. SRI RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA
RFA/1946/2021 · 2025-09-17
Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79781 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79781 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37718-DB RFA No. 1946 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1946 OF 2021 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SRI K. SHIVASHANKAR S/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. T-6 AND 7 DOOR No.1027, NISARGADAMA APARTMENT JAYALAKSHMI ROAD MYSURU - 570 001. …APPELLANT (BY SRI NAVEEN G.S., ADV. -(ABSENT)) AND:
1.
SRI RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA S/O LATE KULLEGOWDA @ VENKATEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2.
KUM. SARASWATHI MAJOR D/O RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA.
3.
KUM. MANGALAGOWRI MAJOR RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA.
4.
KUM. SAKAMMA MAJOR,
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37718-DB RFA No. 1946 of 2021
RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA.
5. RAVI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA.
6.
KUM. ASHWINI AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RANGEGOWDA @ CHIKKEGOWDA.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT YERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK - 571 112.
7.
H.S. NADEESH PREETHAM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O SHANKARLINGE GOWDA RESIDING AT No.82, SOUKAR CHANNIAH ROAD, T K LAYOUT I V STAGE, KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSURU - 570 002. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.05.2021 PASSED IN OS No.809/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, C/c OF ADDITIONAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37718-DB RFA No. 1946 of 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K)
There is no appearance for the appellant.
Till today, office objections have not been complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 04.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required.
2. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 11