SHUBHAM v. SHRI RAMESH RANJAN, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/3767/2025 · 2025-09-25
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3767 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Case was taken up under the category of Personal Appearance cases. Learned counsel for the applicant is not present whereas learned standing counsel is present.
2. Today, learned standing counsel has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. On the basis of compliance affidavit, she submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with.
3. I have perused the compliance affidavit. From the perusal of same, it is clear that order of Writ Court has been complied with.
4. Under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed.
5. Accordingly, file is consigned to the record.
6. In case, any part of order of Writ Court is still remains to be complied with, liberty is given to the applicant to move recall application within 30 days. September 26, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Shubham .....Applicant(s) Shri Ramesh Ranjan, District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad