Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79760 (PNJ)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/49556/2021 · 2025-08-26

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49556-2021(O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2025 AMIT KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: None for the peoner. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed by the peoner under Secon 482 Cr.P.C, for quashing of the order dated 16.09.2021 passed in case tled as State Versus Lovepreet Singh @ Lavi’ registered vide No. NDPS/105/2020 arising out of FIR No.72 dated 23.05.2020, registered under Secons 21/22/25/29 of NDPS Act, 1985 and Secons 467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Staon Mehal Kalan, District Barnala, whereby applicaon to preserve record of Toll Plaza has been rejected. 2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 19.02.2024, none had put in appearance on behalf of the peoner. Even today also, the case has been called twice but none has put in appearance on behalf of the peoner. 4. Given above, the present peon is dismissed for non-prosecuon. Pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of. It is clarified that in case, peoner files an applicaon for revival, the same would not be entertained, however, peoner is permiCed to file a fresh peon and disposal of the present peon will not come in his way provided a fresh peon is filed within 100 days. 26.08.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.08.28 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document