Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45023 CRP No. 550 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 550 OF 2022 (IO) BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. SWATHI M R D/O LATE RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT MANKALALE VILLAGE AVINAHALLI HOBLI SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR TALUK SAGAR -577401
2.
MR CHINMAYA S/O LATE SRI RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT MANKALALE VILLAGE AVINAHALLI HOBLI SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR TALUK SAGAR -577401 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI NISHANTH.S.K FOR SRI SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
MR N L ASHOKA S/O LATE SRI N G LAXMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
2.
MRS RUKMINIYAMMA W/O LATE N G LAXMINARAYANA
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45023 CRP No. 550 of 2022
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
3.
MRS GEETA W/O RAMACHANDRA YAJI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF ANANDAPURAM SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR-577 401
4.
MR SREEPADA RAO S/O LATE SRI K SWAMY RAO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NEHRU NAGAR SAGAR CITY SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR TALUK SAGAR -577 401
5.
MR K S VENKATESHA S/O LATE SRI K SWAMY RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT MANKALALE VILLAGE AVINAHALLI HOBLI SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR -577401
6.
MRS VIMALA W/O SRI MRUTHYUNJAYA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT GEEJAGARU VILLAGE TALAGUPPA HOBLI SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR -577401
7.
MRS B K NAGARATNA W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT RAILWAY STATION ROAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45023 CRP No. 550 of 2022
ANANDAPURAM SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SAGAR-577401 …RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.11.2022 PASSED ON I.A No. XVIII IN OS.NO.23/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, SAGAR, REJECTING I.A.NO.XVIII FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (b) AND (d) OF CPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioners has filed memo which reads as under:
“The petitioners seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above petition. Wherefore, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the undersigned petitioners herein to withdraw the above petition in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR