Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7973 (GAU)

RAJA RAI @ RAJNARAYAN RAI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/1190/2020 · 2025-08-11

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010036652020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1190/2020 RAJA RAI @ RAJNARAYAN RAI S/O- LATE RAMASISH RAI, R/O- MLA HOSTEL BACKSIDE, NABAMILAN PATH, LAST GATE, P.O AND P.S- DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, FINANCE DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND TREASURIES ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 DIST- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 3:THE TREASURY OFFICER DISPUR TREASURY GUWAHATI- 781006 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B KUMAR, MR. S UPADHAY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, TREASURY Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 12.08.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call despite the matter being called up twice today. Heard Mr. R. Borpujari, learned standing counsel for the Finance Department, Assam, who is present on behalf of the official respondents. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., 17.06.2025, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It further appears that the names of two learned counsels for the petitioner are being reflected in the cause list. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant