Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116274 Court No. - 79 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 257 of 2024 Applicant :- Virendra Opposite Party :- State Of Up Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ishwar Chandra Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amarjeet Choudhary,G.A.,Rajesh Yadav Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party no. 1 and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the request to direct the learned court below to decide the Sessions Trial No. 140 of 2020 (State vs. Vineet @ Vikki & others) arising out of Case Crime No. 241 of 2020, under section 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 506, 302, 34 I.P.C. and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Dadri, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge /Fast Track Court-II, Gautam Buddha Nagar within stipulated period. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant had lodged an F.I.R. against the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and three others on 19.03.2020 and after lodging of the F.I.R. police investigated the matter and submitted charge-sheet against the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and filed final report in favour of the opposite party no. 4 on 18.06.2020, upon which learned trial court rejected the final report filed against the opposite party no. 4 and took congnizance and committed the matter to the Sessions for trial. Trial court framed the charges on 16.05.2022 and put the case for evidence and since then the matter is pending and accused persons are lingering the matter and trial court is not interest to decide the same, therefore a direction to the trial court may be issued to conclude the trial. 4. Per contra, learned AGA submitted that after framing of charges the case is on evidence stage and order sheet annexed with the instant application shows that proceedings is going on and trial court has also imposed cost for getting adjournment upon the accused persons, therefore, no interference is required by this Court in the instant matter. 5. Considered the submission advanced on behalf of both parties and having perused the material on record, it is evident from the record that trial is at the stage of evidence and proceedings are going on, even trial court had imposed a penalty for seeking adjournment, at this stage, this court does not see any merit in the instant application and therefore, request for a direction to the trial court for concluding the trial expeditiously is refused. 6. The application filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Bhanu Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad