Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79727 (KAR)

SOCIETY FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21475/2023 · 2025-08-29

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33573 WP No. 21475 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 21475 OF 2023 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SOCIETY FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT SY. NO. 14, BHARATHNAGAR, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, YALAHANKA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 097, REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI. G. DHANANJAY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (LAND GRANT-1), M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR STREET, BENGALURU – 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KHANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, SAMPANGIRAM NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 001. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33573 WP No. 21475 of 2023 3. TAHASHILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YALAHANKA SUB-URBAN, BENGALURU – 560 063. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01.09.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO ACCEPT THE MARKET VALUE OF THE PROPERTY AT THE RATE OF RS. 4,45,00,000 PER ACRE AND CONFIRM THE PERMANENT SANCTION OF SUBJECT LAND MADE IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER SOCIETY BY DEMARKING THE BOUNDARY LINES AS PER THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER NO. RD 342 LGB 2020 BENGALURU DATED 19.11.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner and learned Counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 09.07.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33573 WP No. 21475 of 2023 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 129