Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79718 (PAT)

Vikrant Preet v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./75747/2024 · 2025-04-02

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75747 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-429 Year-2023 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikrant Preet S/O Umesh Ray R/O Village- Madhopur, P.S- Patory, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Soni Kumari W/O Vikrant Preet, D/O Vinod Ray R/O Village- Madhopur, P.S- Patory (Mohanpur O.P), Distt.- Samastipur, Presently R/O Village- Hetanpur, Dhamaun, P.S- Patory, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Ugranath Mallik, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner, husband of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 313 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner denies the allegations made in the F.I.R.. He never committed torture to informant/Opposite Party No. 2 or demanded any dowry. However, the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75747 of 2024(4) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 undertakes to give Rs. 3,000/- (three thousand rupees) per month by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, to the informant/Opposite Party No. 2. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give temporary relief/solace of Rs. 3,000/- (three thousand rupees) per month to informant/Opposite Party No. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Samastipur in connection with Patory (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 429 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. with further following conditions: “(A.) Informant/Opposite Party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner. (B.) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75747 of 2024(4) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 amount per month in the saving bank account of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 . (C.) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond. (D.) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.” shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T