- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44891 CA No. 209 of 2024 In CA No.644 of 2001 In COP No. 82 of 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2024 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 644 OF 2001 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 82 OF 1989 BETWEEN: M/S. SALAR JUNG SUGAR MILLS LTD., (IN LIQUIDATION), REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, 4TH FLOOR, D AND F WING, KENDRIYA SADAN KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. PRAMOD R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SUNIL R.MORAKKA, S/O. NOT KNOWN MAJOR, R/O. 24/B, CAMI, CHEAL ROAD, MUMBAI - 26. 2. SUSHIL R.MORAKKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN MAJOR, R/O 24/B, CAMI, CHEAL ROAD, MUMBAI - 26 Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44891 CA No. 209 of 2024 In CA No.644 of 2001 In COP No. 82 of 1989 3. MUGUSTAB N.NAGHNOOR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, R/O. NO. 40, II FLOOR, SANKY ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU - 52. 4. TIRUMALA DEVAGIRI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, R/O. ANEGUNDI, GANGAVATHI, RAICHUR DISTRICT. 5. P.J.MONOHAR RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN MAJOR, R/O. A-10-1, YAMUNA APTHA KUNDANA, NEW DELHI. …RESPONDENTS THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant in C.A.No.209/2024, either personally or through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44891 CA No. 209 of 2024 In CA No.644 of 2001 In COP No. 82 of 1989 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the matter was listed on 16.10.2025, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply office objections raised in C.A.No.209/2024. The matter is listed today. Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. Hence, C.A.No.209/2024 is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP, KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.:1