2025:MHC:1888 WP No. 27737 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 27737 of 2025 A.Ravi Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd., (TACTV) Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, No.807, 4th Floor Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 2.The General Manager (Admin) / District Revenue Officer The Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd., (TACTV), No.807, 4th Floor Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 3.The Deputy Manager / Special Tashildar The Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd, TACTV Chengalpattu and Kancheepuram Districts, No.4, Egambaranathar Temple Street, Kancheepurm 631 502 Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27737 of 2025 Kancheepuram District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents 1 and 2 to approve the transfer of LCO ID-26683 in the name of the petitioner based on the recommendations of the 3 rd respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.18/2025/TACTV-KPM dated 01.04.2025 and 21.05.2025 respectively forthwith. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Vijay Anand, AGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to approve the transfer of LCO ID – 26683 in the name of the petitioner based on the recommendations made by the 3 rd respondent in proceedings dated 01.04.2025 and 21.05.2025. 2. Heard Mr.M.R.Jothimanian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.E.Vijay Anand, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27737 of 2025 3. The case of the petitioner is that he is a registered cable TV operator and having license for the same. The petitioner submitted an application before the 3 rd respondent seeking for approval of the transfer and the 3 rd respondent through proceedings dated 01.04.2025 and 21.05.2025, recommended giving the approval and the same is pending before the 1 st respondent. Since the 1 st respondent did not act upon the recommendations made by the 3 rd respondent, the petitioner made a representation on 24.06.2025, which was also not acted upon. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court. 4. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances and considering the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 1 st respondent to act upon the recommendations that have been made by the 3 rd respondent through communications dated 01.04.2025 and 21.05.2025 and take a decision within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27737 of 2025 5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 25-07-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Jeni To 1.The Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd., (TACTV) Rep By Its Chairman And Managing Director, No 807, 4th Floor Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 2.The General Manager (Admin) / District Revenue Officer The Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd., (TACTV), No 807, 4th Floor Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 3.The Deputy Manager / Special Tashildar The Tamilnadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd, TACTV Chengalpattu Page No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27737 of 2025 And Kancheepuram Districts, No 4 Egambaranathar Temple Street, Kancheepurm 631 502 Kancheepuram District Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27737 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. Jeni WP No. 27737 of 2025 25-07-2025 Page No.6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis