M/S SINGLA BROTHERS v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/31571/2025 · 2026-04-21
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 797 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 797 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 112 CWP-31571-2025 Date of Decision: 21.04.2026
M/S SINGLA BROTHERS …Petitioner Versus
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate with
Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate and
Mr. Amanveer Singh, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Vikas Arora, D.A.G., Punjab
Ms. Roja Agnihotri, Advocate
For respondent No.3
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release payment with respect to work carried out by it for the respondent along with interest @ 12% per annum.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that admitted liability would be discharged within one month from today subject to verification.
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.04.21 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent may be subjected to interest @ 12% per annum from the date of passing bills.
4.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of with a direction to respondent to release payment to the petitioner within one month from today. If payment is not released within aforesaid period, the respondent would be liable to pay interest @ 9% per annum from the expiry of said period. The petitioner is at liberty to approach appropriate authority qua disputed amount, if any.
5.
Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 21.04.2026 SDK
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.04.21 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document