Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32239 WP No. 1563 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.1563 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1. DINESH LAKSHMANAN S/O P.V. LAKSHMANAN AGED 54 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.F204, PURVA PANORAMA KALENA AGRAHARA BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.S. RAGHU PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ASSISSTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BEGUR SUB-DIVISION
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32239 WP No. 1563 of 2025
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 076. 4. MR. RAVINDRA REDDY S/O TIRUPATI REDDY AGED 50 YEARS NO.45, 6TH CROSS VINAYAKA NAGAR BEHIND MARUTI DENTAL COLLEGE DODDAKAMMANAHALLI BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R.1;
SMT. SUMANGALA G., ADVOCATE FOR R.2 AND R.3;
SRI ROHAN HOSMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R.4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E DATED 04.12.2024 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO TAKE ACTION TO DEMOLISH THE CONSTRUCTION WHICH IS PUT UP AGAINST BBMP BY LAWS AND CONTRARY TO SANCTION PLAN RULES BUILDINGS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32239 WP No. 1563 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
1. On the ground that respondent No.4 is putting up illegal construction on the property which is the subject matter of the writ petition, the petitioner has complained to respondent Nos.2 and 3 - Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) to initiate action against respondent No.4.
On the ground that no action has been initiated sofar, the present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-
"a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner produced at ANNEXURE-E dated 04.12.2024 and direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take action to demolish the construction which is put up against BBMP by laws and contrary to sanction plan rules buildings in the interest of justice and equity. b) Direct respondents to pay cost of this writ petition. c) Issue such other writ or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case."
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32239 WP No. 1563 of 2025
2. In the course of the proceedings, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 upon instructions submits that action has been initiated against respondent No.4 and after due enquiry appropriate orders will be passed. 3. In the light of the action being initiated against respondent No.4, the writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to complete the enquiry in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders after hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner and respondent No.4 herein. 4. The said exercise shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78