MANPREET KAUR SANDHU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7739/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79678 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79678 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
166
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7739-2025 DECIDED ON: 21.07.2025 MANPREET KAUR SANDHU
.....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Divya Gulati , Advocate for the petitioner.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer of issuance of a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 and 3 to protect the life, liberty and property of the petitioner and her children especially at the hands of the respondent No.4 who is taking illegal possession of the properties belongs to late husband of the petitioner and selling them further like the respondents No.5 to 11, in illegal and unlawful manner, despite the fact that the learned Civil Court has already passed an interim order in favour of the petitioner and her children, but despite repeated requests to the learned Court as well as to the high police authorities, the respondent No.4 is selling the said lands further to the other persons like the respondents No.5 to 11. MEENU 2025.07.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7739-2025 -2-
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure P-2), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director General of Police, Punjab, to look into the representation dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks by passing a speaking order. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 21.07.2025
JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document