Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79677 (PAT)

Birjashankar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

MJC/4198/2019 · 2025-04-22

Nani Tagia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4198 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6649 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Birjashankar Prasad, S/o Jagnarayan Prasad, R/o Village- Rukundhi, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 2. Ved Prakash, S/o Shri Dudheshwar Singh, R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 3. Anil Sharma @ Anil Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Mahendra Sharma, R/o Village- Dadpi, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 4. Samsher Ansari, S/o Hasmuddin Ansari, R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 5. Ram Pravesh Paswan, S/o Late Munarik Paswan, R/o Village- Dingrahi, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 6. Rudal Ram, S/o Late Rambali Ram, R/o Village- Akuri, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 7. Jamuna Prasad, S/o Late Chamru Prasad, R/o Village- Jamuien, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 8. Umesh Paswan, S/o Ruplal Paswan, R/o Village- Panduki, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 9. Mahendra Yadav @ Mahendra Kumar, S/o jaigobind Singh, R/o Village- Neema, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 10. Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar, S/o Seetaram Singh, R/o Village- Khaira Mohan, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 11. Umesh Kumar, S/o Girdhari Yadav, R/o Village- Baksar, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 12. Jairam Yadav, S/o Chandradeep Yadav, R/o Village- Aseyas, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 13. Suryadeep Paswan, S/o Ganeshi Paswan, R/o Village- Jajapur, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 14. Ram Kalesh Yadav, S/o Janeshwar Yadav, R/o Village- Baxar, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 15. Devendra Singh, S/o Raghunath Singh, R/o Village- Mandwa, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 16. Dineshwar Kumar Singh, S/o Kailash Singh, R/o Village- Neerpura, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 17. Panpati Devi, D/o Ram Bisun Singh, R/o Village- Piparahi, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 18. Md. Faruque Ahmad, S/o Md. Khalil Ahmad, R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 19. Md. Samsuddin Ansari, S/o Hasmuddin, R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 20. Bhusan Kumar, S/o Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village- Seikhpura, P.S.- Goh, Patna High Court MJC No.4198 of 2019(2) dt.22-04-2025 2/4 District- Aurangabad. 21. Brajesh Singh @ Brajesh Kumar, S/o Lal Bahadur Singh, R/o Village- Bazar Verma, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 22. Sunil Kumar Paswan, S/o Marachu Paswan, R/o Village- Dewaraha, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 23. Kunjbihari Choudhary, S/o Shri Shyam Lal, R/o Village- Gamhari, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 24. Baban Ram, S/o Dudheshwar Ram, R/o Village- Ahiyapur, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 25. Ram Binay Paswan, S/o Ram Surat Paswan, R/o Village- Mirpur, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 26. Mahamaya Paswan, S/o Brijkishore Paswan, R/o Village- Pandey Karma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad. 27. Nandu Kumar, S/o Komal Prasad, R/o Village- Jahri, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad. 28. Sunil Kumar, S/o Shri Vijay Yadav, R/o Village- Dahru Bigha, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad. 29. Upendra Prasad Verma, S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village- Teyap, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad. 30. Bilas Choudhary, S/o Bideshi Choudhary, R/o Village- Chauthaiya, P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad. 31. Sukhdeo Chouhan, S/o Tuleshwar Chouhan, R/o Village- Pirthu, P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad. 32. Sachchida Nand Singh, S/o Ram Pravesh Singh, R/o Village- Dosarai (Sado Saray), P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad. 33. Naresh Paswan, S/o Shri Ramchandra Paswan, R/o Village- Pirthu, P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Amir Subhani, the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Gupteshwar Pandey, the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. Rahul Ranjan Mahiwal, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 4. Paras Nath, Inspector General, Magadh Range, Gaya (Post of Deputy Inspector General, Magadh Range, Gaya has been removed), 5. Deepak Barnwal, Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad. 6. Mankateshwar Ojha, the Officer-in-Charge, Goh Police Station, Aurangabad. 7. Vishwajeet Kumar, the Officer-in-Charge, Salaiya Police Station, Aurangabad. 8. Ajay Shankar Kumar, the Officer-in-Charge, Uphara Police Station, Aurangabad. Patna High Court MJC No.4198 of 2019(2) dt.22-04-2025 3/4 9. Balwant Singh, the Officer-in-Charge, Kasma Police Station, Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 3, Advocate For the State : Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2025 This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 21.05.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6649 of 2017, wherein this Court had passed the following order: “The petitioners would be at liberty to approach the Superintendent of Police by filing their claim on the basis of duty command issued in their favour. If such an application is made within four weeks from today, the Superintendent of Police (respondent No. 5) will be obliged to dispose it of by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The writ application stands disposed of.” 2. Opposite Party No.5 has filed the show cause, wherein, in paragraph No.10 it has been stated as under: “10. That it is humbly and respectfully submitted that on the basis of attending facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are Patna High Court MJC No.4198 of 2019(2) dt.22-04-2025 4/4 not entitled to any honorarium since they were neither re-appointed nor their services was extended as per rule by the competent authority after 31.08.2011. Accordingly in the unanimous opinion of the committee the petitioners claim is not considerable. In view of the matter, the application of the petitioners deserves to be dismissing outright.” 3. On perusal of paragraph No.10 of the show cause filed by the Opposite Party No.5, I find that the order dated 21.05.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6649 of 2017 has been complied with by the Opposite Party No.5. 4. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed and disposed of. Narendra/- (Nani Tagia, J) U