Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79671 (ALL)

SHYAMA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WTAX/3545/2025 · 2025-07-30

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128538-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 3545 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyama Devi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Charan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a mandamus commanding the concern respondent authority to ensure the closing of new liquor shops in the concern village Karimpur Bind and Khanpur Charawa, situated near Ramnagar, Shahganj District Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner no. 1 has already made a detailed representation to the respondent on 27.5.2025, which is pending consideration. 4. Learned Standing Counsel very fairly states that in case any such representation is still pending and has not been disposed of, the same will be considered and decided expeditiously. 5. In view of the above, on consent and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally asking the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 ventilating their grievance within two weeks from today and in case any such representation is being preferred definitely the same would be looked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance with law within six weeks thereafter. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 A.K.Srivastava Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad