Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7965 (PNJ)

VIJAY ALIAS MAGAL & ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/44904/2025 · 2026-07-17

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

256 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44904-2025 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 VIJAY ALIAS MAGAL & ANOTHER ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sumit Puri, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 222 dated 13.05.2025, under Sections 115, 118(2) and 3(5) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-4). Vide order dated 19.08.2025 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 19.08.2025 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-4). In terms of the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by this Court, parties have appeared before the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gurugram and as per the report dated 19.09.2025 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.17 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-44904-2025 -2- A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused.The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gurugram, accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No. 222 dated 13.05.2025, under Sections 115, 118(2) and 3(5) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 17, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.17 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document