- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30935 WP No. 18891 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.18891 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. RUDRESH S/O SHIVARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.135/14 BASAVESHWARA BLOCK 14TH WARD, K.R. NAGAR, MYSURU DISTRICT-571602. 2. KRUTHIK N S/O NAGARAJU B.R., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.2, BYADARAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST MYSURU-571602. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KARUMBAIAH T.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560001 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU-570016. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30935 WP No. 18891 of 2024 3. THE CHIEF OFFICER MUNICIPAL OFFICE HASSAN MYSURU HIGHWAY V.V.ROAD, K.R. NAGAR MYSURU DISTRICT-571602. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. B.J.SOMAYAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R-3 TO HAND OVER POSSESSION OF SHOP NO.11 WHICH WAS NOTIFIED AND AUCTIONED AS PER ANNX-A TO THE P-1 AND HAND OVER POSSESSION OF SHOP NOS.23, 83 AND 84 TO THE P-2 AS THEY ARE THE SUCCESFUL BIDDERS WITHING A SPECIFIED PERIOD AND TO DIRECTING THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE ANNX-B THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.03.2024 AND ANOTHER REPRESENTATION AT ANNX-G DATED 6.06.2024 GIVEN BY THE P-1 AND TO HAND OVER THE POSSESSION OF SHOP PREMISES BEARING NOS.11, 23, 83 AND 84 TO THE PETITIONER RESPECTIVELY AND TO DIRECTING THE R-3 TO CONSIDER THE ANNX-C THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.03.2024 GIVEN BY THE P-1 AND HAND OVER THE VACANT POSSESSION OF SHOP NOS.11, 23, 83 AND 84 TO THE PETITIONER RESPECTIVELY WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30935 WP No. 18891 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "In view of the settlement arrived between the parties out of Court, petitioner does not wish to prosecute the above petition. Hence, the above petition may be disposed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity." Consequentially, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB