- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39768 WP NO.7654 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7654 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SAVITHREE R. W/O LATE S. LINGAPPA , AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.4TH CROSS, GEDALAHALLI, SANJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAYA C.P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU. REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION. BENGALURU. 4. THASILDAR (ADDITIONAL) BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39768 WP NO.7654 OF 2023 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER YELAHANKA TALUK PANCHAYATH, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. 6. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER VADEERAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO WITHDRAW THE LETTER DATED 24TH NOVEMBER, 2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 01ST FEBRUARY, 2023 AND 28TH FEBRUARY, 2023 MADE BY SON OF THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 4 VIDE ANNEXURES 'J', 'K' AND 'L' AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE KHATHA BOOK AS PER THE HAKKU PATRA OF THE PETITIONER AS MENTIONED IN ANNEXURE-C; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for ninth time for non-compliance of office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39768 WP NO.7654 OF 2023 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6