210 IN THE SALINDER SI STATE OF HA CORAM : HO Present : Mr Ms. Mr Ms. Mr LAPITA BANE Lea that the since th not to press the Lea In v infructuous. Con JANUARY 21 Prince Whether speakin Whether reportab THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-21189-2024 DATE OF DECISION ER SINGH Versus F HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Priyanka Garg, Advocate for the Mr. Aman Bahri, Addl. A.G., Harya Ms. Palak Jain, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for res NERJI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on beh nce the grievance of the petitioner is r ss the present writ petition. Learned State counsel is also present In view of the aforesaid submission Connected application(s), if any, sha 21, 2025 peaking/reasoned : Yes/No eportable : Yes/No AB AND HARYANA AT ISION : JANUARY 21, 2025 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS APITA BANERJI for the petitioner. Haryana. for respondent No..3 n behalf of the petitioner submits er is redressed, he has instructions present. ission, writ petition is dismissed as y, shall also stand disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.01.21 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment