Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20.02.2025
22. Ct No. 28 SG [Rejected] C. R. M. (A) 350 of 2025
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1320 of 2024 dated 25.11.2024 under Sections 69/351(3)/3(5) of BNS.
And
In Re: Karim Sk.
…… Petitioner
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick.
……for the petitioner
Ms. Sonali Das, Mr. Debanshu Ghorai. …...for the State
Mr. Kazi M. Rahman.
… for the de facto complainant
1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties.
2. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner has cohabited with the victim on the false promise of marriage.
3. In light of the aforesaid conduct, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
5. Personal appearance of the investigating officer is noted and dispensed with.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)