- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27143 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 70 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SMT. SUMITRA WIFE OF LATE MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT No. 417 3RD "F" CROSS, EAST STOP NGEF, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR BENGALURU PIN CODE No-560 016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJU C N, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI SHANKAR S/O N. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT No. 5, 100 FEET ROAD 10TH MAIN, 1ST BLOCK HRBR LAYOUT BENGALURU PIN CODE No - 560 016. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAJU S M, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED IN C.C.No.51641/2015, DATED 04.07.2017, ON THE FILE OF THE LVII A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL UNIT,BANGALORE AND IN CRL.A.No.25110/2017, DATED Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27143 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2019 15.10.2018, ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MAYO HALL, BANGALORE (CCH-20). THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner and her counsel are present. Respondent and his counsel are present. 2. A joint memo is filed and it is signed by the petitioner, respondent and their respective counsel. As per the terms of the joint memo the matter is settled for Rs.8,00,000/- including the amount in deposit in a sum of Rs.1,50,900/- and Rs.2,500/- deposited by the petitioner before the trial Court. For the remaining balance of Rs.6,46,600/- petitioner has agreed to pay Rs.2,00,000/- on or before 31.07.2025 and remaining balance within three months from this day. Respondent has agreed for the above terms. Petitioner has no objection for the respondent withdrawing Rs.1,59,000/- and Rs.2,500/- deposited by the petitioner before the trial Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27143 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2019 3. In view of the above settlement offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded. In view of compounding of the offence, revision petition is disposed of as offence compounded. 4. If the petitioner fails to pay the balance amount as agreed, the judgment of the trial Court will revive. 5. Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount in deposit, deposited by the petitioner. 6. Respondent is directed to furnish his bank account details to the trial Court so as enable the trial Court to transfer the amount in deposit directly to his bank account. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54